Zero Speaks.: 2010

I will back up the rest of this E-Mail exchange later, and as it unfolds more.
First I am posting this mainly for my JREF friends.
For your entertainment, I give you the biggest creationist pwnage in the history of the Internets.

Nephie:

This is my response to the "Slander!" video that you made about me (www.youtube.com/watch?v=_BzRvUR5T0o) in response to the video I made about you. It is long because I will send it to many others who are interested in the details, and I hope it will enlighten some of those who have been tricked by your chronic dishonesty.

*****
After recovering from the comatose stupor that always befalls me after listening to your mind-numbing obfuscations of fact, I have noted some of your errors:

1. You claim that I sent messages to ALL of your YT "friends" (over 2000). A blatantly extreme exaggeration.
2. You said that "I was out of work, temporarily...." That implies that you found work again, however you never saw fit to make the obvious slam-dunk rebuttal (to my assertion that you appear to continue to be unemployed and freeloading) that you ARE employed. That is highly suspicious and strongly suggests that you indeed have not resumed work to this day. WHY HAVE YOU NOT STATED THAT YOU ARE WORKING IF YOU ACTUALLY ARE???
3. You say that I called Sharon a "mentally disabled person". I recall stating that she was "cognitively-impaired" as anyone that has suffered a "massive stroke" would be.
4. Regarding your accusation that I filed a false report to a government agency: I did no such thing. I DID report you, but with NO false information (and your assumption that it was me was dangerously premature since it could have been anyone). And I qualified any unconfirmed suspicions rather than stating those as definite fact. Calling a government hotline and providing information (such as the link to your video admission of freeloading and other details) is NOT illegal. In civilized nations people are expected to speak up when they feel they have reason to suspect abuse, so long as they do not make false allegations. Your claim that I filed a false report to a government agency is what amounts to slander here, Bozo. I stated no lies and the recording can prove it. Thus your statement that "I could have civil AND criminal charges brought against this person for this" (referring to filing a false report) is untrue and malicious. You are pretending to be able to have me incarcerated and financially throttled with a simple phone call, when you have NO evidence of false report and have yet to invalidate a SINGLE defamatory statement that I supposedly made (if it's TRUE, moron, it ain't slander).
5. You also said that I claimed you were "abusing" her. I only told Protective Services that I SUSPECTED that you were FINANCIALLY abusing her, and explained with plenty of reasons. The common interpretation of you statement is that I said you had physically assaulted her -- typically deceptive on your part.
6. Referring to myself and other atheists, you stated "They would defame someone and slander them because they hate god so much." You have stated in numerous videos that you believe all (or almost all) atheists secretly "know" there is a god and simply reject him. As much as you want it, god has NOT been proven to exist and therefore you cannot speak to whether atheist hearts are immorally defiant toward your undetectable supernatural "creator" who you pretend to know has made his existence so evident to us. So your assertion (that we hate god) implies that atheists are simply immoral. This is defamatory, because your assertions are not provable (or true) and they severely attack our character.
You have managed to slander me (and all atheists) yet AGAIN.
7. You said that "Just out of fun I called a lawyer and got hold of a lawyer that deals with defamation and slander cases". So are you indicating that you have consulted a DIFFERENT lawyer than the famous one (Jay Sekulow of the ACLJ ) that you told me (in your June 11/2010 PM) was representing you in a slander suit against me??? Allow me to explain something to you: By identifying a specific lawyer as your representative (and a big-name pro-bono rep who you claim is aggressively pursuing me to make an example of me, no less), you have deceptively and maliciously attempted to invoke duress, and by continuing to fail to retract your claim of that representation, you continue your attempted duress and compound your legal culpability daily. You have repeated your threats of imminent and severe prosecution and have ignored my requests for confirmation/retraction of your claim of representation by Jay Sekulow. Your obligation to retract a false statement of representation does not disappear with time, and your culpability for damages for such a lie only mounts each time you refuse to address it, and with each day that passes. By not retracting, you only dig yourself deeper into your shithole and it only enhances my case against you when you repeatedly refuse to undo such a false threat. So I ask again: Do you retract your claim that Mr Sekulow is your lawyer, or am I to remain under the only reasonable interpretation (of your communications) that he continues to represent you? His office fails to acknowledge you as a client, is getting fed up with my queries (you recall that you urged me to contact Mr Sekulow to find out what he has in store for me) and they may well issue a "cease and desist" which will force your admission to lying anyway. Best that you get it over with before it goes that far, Sporty.
You also state (in your "Slander!" video) that the lawyer you just called said you had an "open & shut" case, but has this unspecified attorney seen your freeloading confession video? Did you show him all our recent correspondence? Does he know a thing about your lengthy YouTube history of extreme defamation of the non-religious? You really think that YOU, of all people, has a slander case? Oh please....
8. Your assertion "A few buttons and this person will be sitting in front of a court, within a few weeks" amounts to malicious attempt to cause distress: you are not psychic and can't state, as fact, what prosecution would happen, and as explained above, you have NOT established that I reported any false statements, and you have not even specified a SINGLE claim I made that you could disprove.
9. I notice that you switched from referring to me specifically to "they" when discussing the filers of DMCA's against your videos. Too late, fuckwit, you already accused me of that in a recent PM (as well as accused me of "illegally downloading" your "copyrighted" material). I have never DMCA'd anyone in my life. I will hold both of these claims of unlawful copyright violations against you.

And speaking of copyright, what's with the "(c) Nephilimfree Uploading verbatim without consent violates copyright law" watermark on your videos? I could not find anything like "Nephilimfree" at the United States Copyright Office website (http://cocatalog.loc.gov). Even IF you are allowed to thus claim copyright to your videos without registering with copyright agencies (I don't know--yet), do you seriously claim to OWN the copyright to ALL the graphics and clips in ALL those videos? Are you REALLY the owner of all those images? Seems to me it is YOU that has been breaking copyright law. And are YOU qualified to give legal advice regarding copyright LAW pertaining to copying YT videos (which is NOT the same as YT Terms of Service)?

Now regarding my reporting your apparent financial abuse of Sharon:
I stand by it 100%. In the video you posted in February (featured on my channel with my commentary) you said that you were "basically homeless" because Sharon was leaving, i.e., you were unable to afford even basic shelter without her support. And the timeline you described indicated 2 YEARS of your unemployed freeloading off her. Furthermore, you have VERY CONSPICUOUSLY not stated that you have found work since then, and continue your incessant YouTube activities, so it DOES appear that your financial mooching CONTINUES to this day. Her son was disturbed enough with your apparent 2 years of freeloading (following your getting FIRED) to talk her into leaving you earlier this year [unfortunately only briefly—you have commented that she felt "sorry" for you and returned]. And as her confused exchange with you at the end of your "Slander!" video confirms, there clearly is reason to question whether she is intellectually competent to give consent to let you live entirely off her probably-already-stretched disability benefits. So the facts seem to indicate that a social services agency in fact SHOULD have been called-in to assess her vulnerable situation. Who are YOU to decide what's best for her?
So I am satisfied that at least now the appropriate body will monitor her situation and if you remain unemployed without reason (as appears to be the case), that continued scrutiny will be applied. Assuming (but not definitively stating as fact) that as the evidence suggests, you continue to freeload, maybe you will now be motivated enough to get off your lazy able-bodied ass and find some work to pay your own way and no longer live off the tax-payer-provided social benefits that were not intended for YOUR pockets.

Regarding you pretending to sue me:
Your prosecution threats are as limp as your underdeveloped masculinity and you have the following to account for:
1. Defamation: slander and now libel (for PUBLISHING slander in YT video): for falsely claiming:
•That I filed a false report to a government agency,
•That I filed false DMCA's (perjury) against you
•That I illegally downloaded copyrighted material,
•That I am immoral and god-hating (and an all-round meanie-booboo)
2. Harassment and malicious attempt to inflict duress by:
•falsely claiming (as far as the facts suggest) that I am being prosecuted on your behalf by high-power lawyer Jay Alan Sekulow, pro bono, for defamation and religious persecution, that I did not commit and which you assert I am guilty of
•claiming that you have an "open and shut" case for slander and defamation when you do not
•claiming that I am guilty of--and therefore can get jail time and financial penalty for--something I did not do (file a false report)
•claiming that you have the power to press a few buttons "and this person will be sitting in front of a court, within a few weeks", when you do not, and can't even know how things would proceed
3. Hate speech (elaboration is below)
4. Possible copyright violations by indicating "Nephilimfree" copyright claim on other people's materials

So you already have a great deal that can be held against you. Additionally, I can't believe that you would sue me because:
•You appear to be an unskilled dead-beat and employment risk (fired after physical altercation with your boss) with little or no assets
•You have no legal basis for your claims so no lawyer will take you without payment of retainer
•You have so defiled and thoroughly documented your own buffoonery that even IF by some miracle you managed to get a favourable slander judgement, what additional harm to your reputation (as the YouTube village idiot) would be compensable?
•You have not even been specifically identified in this so-called slander against you. [There is a big difference between "slandering" a YouTube persona (such as "Nephilimfree") and a specifically identified person.] So what tangible damages could you seek? Have I jeopardized your employment??
•You are mortified at the thought of having your dubious employment history, finances, criminal record and lawsuit history, and spectacularly-obnoxious YT history (more on this below) scrutinized under discovery process
•You are a prolific liar and thus rarely do what you say you will. You are a coward who can only confront people through a one-way monitor with the censorship dial turn to maximum.

The next paragraph describes what I think you would have your subs and "friends" believe (NOT what I think is true, so don't quote this out-of-context):
You spent almost all of the last 4 years diligently earning a living--interrupted only by a "temporary" "loss" of your work. You used your spare time simply spreading the "gospel" on YouTube and generously looking after your stroke-victim diabetic friend. And then along came a demon-possessed monster that hated his god and wanted revenge by attacking saintly you. This monster told people that you are a freeloader when you actually have spent thousands on her and far more than she has been able to reciprocate during your brief "temporary" unemployment without income, and you are back to earning your own way. Your YouTube confrontations are entirely the fault of immoral pretenders that secretly believe in god and hate his rules. They target you (with false copyright claims and otherwise) because you are so astute and incontestable in your understanding of scripture and god's plan for man. You have never done anything illegal or even contrary to YT policy. Like a modern-day Moses, God has chosen you to evangelize for Him on the internet, and you humbly comply, a willing and admirable martyr for God in the ultimate battle of Good versus Evil.

The next paragraph is what I think is the actual truth (based on what I have learned of you, and is not presented here as statements of established fact):
You have taken financial advantage of a vulnerable, simple-minded and uneducated woman who you said suffered a stroke 4 or more years ago and moved into your apartment very soon thereafter. Within 2 years (probably considerably sooner), you had a confrontation with your boss which accelerated into a physical skirmish over which you were fired (and possibly charged with assault & battery), without right to unemployment benefits. You realized that although not a lot, Sharon's disability benefits were enough to pay your rent, food, etc, so you felt little motivation to seek employment again, particularly since you have no sought-after skills that would buy a significantly-more comfortable lifestyle. So you figured you may as well coast along on simple-Sharon's back (who was not hard to convince that you were the "best thing that ever happened to her") and effectively decided to retire at age 47 in 2008, taking up YT as your primary source of entertainment. You pretend (and have increasingly convinced yourself) that you are answering "God's calling" with your YT activities, and thus feel less guilty about your freeloading. Based on the social skills, knowledge base, and typical demeanour that you present on YT, you appear to have a mixed personality disorder characterized by several character flaws. You utterly lack a developed rational capacity, but you are secretly aware of it and try to compensate with laughable and fundamentally-ignorant pretences at unassailable scholarly acumen. Your manipulative and deceptive tactics and sneaky distortions reveal the fact that you are aware of your own dishonesty and thus you are not insane, NOT non-responsible for your actions. You are not crazy. You are simply an asshole, an admiration-desperate misfit, a pathetic fraud, and a self-pitying "persecuted" "victim" who has found in religion a cloak for his moral nudity and a ticket to feeling superior.

Some perspective:
Religion, as an honest pursuit of ultimate truth and compliance with appropriate moral standards, can be legitimate and honourable. [Any sincere truth-seeker will at least have scrutinized the "answers" of religion for possible merit and it is that same pursuit of truth and personal integrity that leads the intellectually-honest beyond religion's inadequate "answers" and dogma.] People like you do not pursue religion primarily for truth or moral integrity. Your childish, archaic interpretation of Christian morality bastardizes and cherry-picks it to excuse and validate your stunted immaturity and personal shortcomings. You delude yourself to think that you are made innocent by simply believing a particular dogmatic obscurity (repent, believe in Jesus' forgiveness, be born again, blah blah blah) and then you are magically transformed, as worthy and respectable as anyone alive, regardless of your past and even your future intensions. You assert that by merely siding with the "right" version of religious belief, you are magically granted favour by your judgement-obsessed (and evidentially painfully-shy) god, who apparently leaves the vast bulk of humanity (no less culpable for their shortcomings than you) to suffer eternal fire, for simply having failed to discover the secret belief formula for "salvation".
In your failure to acquire normal adult psychological development, you narcissistically seek the admiration and obsequious support of other theists in the YT community. Many have supported you simply because you are outspoken for the religious side (despite your repeated abortions of direct debate). But they are being shown your hypocrisy and are cluing--in.
This little drama of ours is not about the "godless" versus the "faithful", as you would portray it so that the theists you have fooled would rally around you. YT has over 1000 videos about you, thoroughly documenting your bewilderingly aggressive attacks on the non-religious (the "evil-lutionists" as you say it) where you pretend that the world's brightest and most-credentialed scientists, and the rationalists like me that learn from them, are joined in a mass conspiracy against your pre-medieval folklore and obsolete ethics. Even worse: in your ~6-month-old "Tough on the Truth" video (copy at www.youtube.com/watch?v=IsqpIgHbpAU and a good commentary is at v=kY19CBYbu6E), where you try to explain how you are in fact being representative of god's justice, you state the following:
•"The evolutionist talks about it [evolution] because he wants to break your faith—YOUR faith...."
•"...their subconscience is telling them 'There IS a god, there's no excuse, he's the creator'...."
•"...You see, many of these people they have so much hate in their heart..."
•"...so when god slams the door shut on them [evolutionists] ... God says: 'Do you remember that Christian on YouTube, who told you how the Bible proves itself to be literally true? ... Do you remember that fellow on Youtube ... he explained that this and such is true and therefore evolution CANNOT be true...You didn't listen to his words, did you? He gave you scientific PROOF that life is designed, and you didn't care....'...and they're not listening...their heart are spiritually dead"
•"So you have to understand that when I or some other Christians gets harsh with some of these people, it's not necessarily that were not putting forth a good example for Christ, it's that were fighting against people that lead other people to reject god. And that's a worthwhile battle."
•"...those who espouse... hate toward all manner of the truth—of creation, of God's Bible being literally true--that he wrote it himself or even that God exists: we are expressing nothing more than SERVICE for god when we are TOUGH on them"
•"Now if God, merciful, loving, compassionate god, can send two female bears... to come snarling out of the brush and slap to death a half a dozen boys for MOCKING his prophet, do you not think that God supports you when you are tough on these kinds of people? Because for all you know, that one poor pathetic, blind, spiritually-dead person is going to lead someone else to Hell. And that's just not acceptable."
•"There is a time and place for strength and unwillingness .to compromise."
•"If someone is espousing hate toward god, and leading others astray, I'm gonna put a stomp on them, if I'm so inclined, and I'm not gonna feel guilty a bit about it."
So in a single video you claim that atheists have chosen immorality over submission to a god you pretend to know has revealed himself to us, that we try to break the faith of theists and lead them to Hell, that God will cite your prophetic warnings [delusions of grandeur] as reason to reject us from heaven, and that you have actually proven that evolution is impossible! Furthermore, you JUSTIFY FATAL VIOLENCE (you just said Bible is LITERALLY TRUE) against children (2 Kings 2-23-24) for merely "mocking his prophet" (calling him "baldy"), and you use that example as justification to be "harsh" and "tough" to "fight against" in "battle" and to guiltlessly "put a stomp on" us "god-hating", "spiritually-dead" hell-bound rebels, all in alleged "SERVICE" to your god's will. This is JUSTIFICATION OF VIOLENCE AND INCITEMENT TO VIOLENCE AND HATE ('I'll stomp on you' is a PHYSICAL threat unless otherwise clarified), particularly for the sin of mocking a "prophet". It targets a specific population for their beliefs regarding religion: HATE SPEECH and PERSECUTION BASED ON RELIGIOUS ORIENTATION.
Perhaps YouTube should be informed....

Your YT legacy is a prolific campaign (note the spelling) of character assassination, extreme denigration and outright hate speech against those that are simply incapable of believing in your undetectable and uncivilized "god". There are a great many similar examples of your outrageous attacks on the moral credibility of us non-believers for no reason other than our easily-justifiable scientific position on religious supernaturalism. You cannot retract or DMCA all that evidence of your irrational antagonism (nor the evidence I have of your harassment of me).

I am standing up on behalf of the thousands of honest rationalists that you ludicrously and reprehensibly dismiss as less-informed and morally degenerate, and who you have bullied with your threat of putting a "stomp on" us for daring to question you and your biblical literalism with all its draconian "justice". Your motivation is selfish and self-aggrandizing. You are a fanatic who defies centuries of science and believes (or pretends to) that we are in end-times, approaching Biblical apocalypse. You think that The Almighty himself has selected you for a YouTube mission, and that your hate-laden evangelism is crucial: you have the stupidity to believe that despite your god being "just", your efforts will actually make the difference in whether some will go to Heaven or to Hell (which would mean that your god is arbitrary, not "just"). It is your kind that believes they are in "service" to god when they are "tough," sometimes resorting to violence to further their "holy" agendas for a vengeant god that endorses atrocity. You believe that the human species, singularly, is born evil, that we therefore all deserve eternal Hell, and can only escape it by believing in (and submitting to) an invisible, constantly-mind-reading, condemnatory omnipotent judge who rewards nothing but the willingness to believe without evidence. Such guilt-ridden dogmas are compromising and psychologically damaging to children, who deserve better from their adults. Us rationalists scare you because we have free minds and are not bound by the blurred lenses of religious presumptions. We are not the reality "denialists" here: we are the ones that recognize that this life is all we know that we have, wish to live in reality, and have the moral integrity to not pretend to know more than we do, especially regarding supernatural claims, for which ZERO evidence exists. You recognize the strength of our self-honestly and loathe the threat it poses to the mysticism and the arrogant pretence that inflates your immatured self-esteem and excuses your blundered-away life. YOU, Nephie, clearly represent all that can go wrong with religion, and your actions need to be called-out, not ignored. That's what my channel is about: exposing the hypocrisy of a dangerous, hate-promoting bully and that has had free reign to inflict harm for way too long.

I have the support of a great many and am willing to face your baseless threats of litigation, wherever that may lead. BRING IT ON.
DON'T chicken out and lie about it, like you do with those that agree to confront you in debate.
DON"T say that I am insane and "it wouldn't be fair", or that you don't have it in your heart to "crush" me or that god told you to "turn the other cheek" to set an example of piety (which appears to have been your intent when asking people to comment in your channel to tell you what they think you should do about me—you want to be able to back down from your litigation threat against me while by playing humble martyr).
DON'T pretend that you are starting proceedings and just stall and stall (so that interest wanes in this drama) and then claim that for some technical reason it feel apart.
DON'T pretend that you have become "too busy "—you haven't even challenged my assertion that you still appear to be unemployed after 2 years. How many sycophantic butt-licking fans are going to remain after you say that suing me "wasn't the right thing to do" for whatever reason you pretend? Especially after I PM everyone that comments on your videos about me with complete copies of THIS and all our former correspondence (since they expressed interest, it would not be "spam").
Perhaps you'll see this as an opportunity to sucker some money from your subs by e-begging to pay for legal costs (and then probably say you used it up and still ran short)? Go for it.

SO SUE ME, if you're not yella, you deceitful, pathologically-lying, freeloading, self-pitying, incompetent, juvenile, scientifically-illiterate, intellectually-dishonest, superstition-promoting, morally-grotesque fuck-up and fraud masquerading as a faith-healing, scientifically-undefeatable YouTube prophet you pretend that God talks to and favours. I am a well-paid manager with plenty of net worth. COME AND GET IT.
Your reign of colossal stupidity, fraudulent promotion of "God's will", and insipid attacks and threats upon the rational, is fizzling out, Nephie. Reality beckons.

SUE ME. PLEASE. I double-doozie dares ya.

-TheAnniePies