Saturday, January 17, 2009

Shall we begin. The RRS.

To begin, we need to start defining what direction this blog will take by taking official stances on certain issues. 

The first stance I have decided to take involves my feelings toward the RRS or Rational Response Squad. If you are unfamiliar with the RSS, they have a website, and you can google it if you wish to. However your google request will just get drowned in a sea of "Kelly's tits" requests in the Google machine. Let me explain...

The Rational Response Squad started out as a worthy endeavor in my book - a group of atheists who were going to evangelize atheism to the world in a non-profit way.

Fair enough... yet after a very good start (Richard Dawkins interview, radio show started, blood drive during prayer day, deny the holy spirit challenge thingy) it quickly faded to mediocrity.  I would like to point out that Rook Hawkins (that has to be a pen name or his mom was high) and Kelly (about whom I will mention more later) were the major contributors to the rapid decline of this semi-serious group of 20-something-year old losers. Losers who wish to remain at home typing on the internet about how religion sucks, while people like you and me pay for their living, through *ahem, "contributions." Ok, so far I agree, if they give quality research and/or advance knowledge in any way, or if they have entertainment value, they deserve to make money lounging around at home.  Sadly, they possess none of these redeeming qualities.

But wait... there is more! Call now and we will throw in extra knowledge of the RRS sillyness for free... and  a miniature travel version of our product, for double the price. 

Let's start with Kelly.  Kelly, who seems to be the money maker of the group (by swinging her tits around on a vertical pole- not that there is anything wrong with that, I personally love seeing tits swinging around on a pole) is rumoured to have made a porn film. I can't find the porn, I can only find a pic HERE! I don't know if it is fake but it looks nicer than she normally does on her site with clothes (barely) on. Anyway, moving on. She appears to be the philosopher/historian of the group.  This "bitch with tits" actually went to college... go figure. Although nobody can actually find verification of her attaining a degree, she does not let that stop her from posting rampantly on the website her "learned input" on topics such as psychology, history, geology, biology, chemistry, astronomy, mathmatics, physics, etc.  Not to mention, overall an attention-whore.

Next we have Brian Sapient.  This leader of RSS/guy who's fucking Kelly/idiot, seems to be a complete joke, going so far as to make a video about how he is contemplateing having a child just to raise it as an atheist warrior "for the cause." Has anyone ever told this guy that bringing life into this world just might take a little more thought than that? Oh and claims to be really smart.  Essentially, this "leader" has done such a bang-up job with creative control of RSS content that he has actually encouraged the Richard Dawkins Foundation to distance itself from the group.

And what can I say about dildo *cough I mean, Rook Hawkins (or, more likely "I wish I was Dawkins"). Plagiarizer. Copy-and-paste-and-pawn-off-as-my-own-work-er.  And- your gonna have to trust me here from my own experience with him in Stickam chat rooms-a hopeless romantic of 16 yr old girls.  Even if they live hundreds of miles away from him, he hopes to score in PM's. Oh! and he wrote a book no publisher would touch. I expect to see it "Publish On-Demand" real soon. Apparently this guy truly believes that being able to type something into google and reading a couple of pages not only makes him a great researcher of information, but qualifies him to spout his opinion as authority. Need I say more?

And whatever became of the RRS "youtube blasphemy challenge"? Yeah, what a fucking joke!

In fact, the only thing rational about the Rational Response Squad is that rational human beings are looking to profit off of you and me through donations so that they can live a care free life of doing nothing to advance the human race while enjoying the lap of luxury. I can see no difference between them and the expelled feces of Peter Popoff and Chris Crocker. Money-grubbers meets attention-whores.

Thus, my official stance on the Rational Response Squad is that, although they may have started out as a worthy cause, in the end they turned out to be a bunch of teenage-minded people only looking to profit off of other people's donations so they can live the life of low work hours while partying and shirking responsibility for their actions.  As a side note, I cannot believe that NBC took this group seriously, but that's a topic for another day. *cough Ray Comfort *cough
                                                                                                                                                               





     

4 comments:

  1. Uh hum..."teenage-minded people." I take offense to that. Secondly, I've never even heard about this group. And I'm almost afraid to google it mainly because I have no interest whatsoever in seeing some woman's boobs on a pole...or whatever it was.

    So, what makes you different from Dildo? I mean...after all, you said he "truly believes that being able to type something into google and reading a couple of pages not only makes him a great researcher of information, but qualifies him to spout his opinion as authority." Well, David, where exactly did you get your information on these people from? The encyclopedia?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Never will I say I am an authority on anything. I have no degree, this site is purely for my opinions, and everyone can take them with a grain of salt.

    ReplyDelete
  3. ... I also might add that I have experience doing actual research for projects. In an actual research library, looking through hundred yr old books for weeks to try and find records of one guy. I do know what it means to do tedious and very difficult research. When someone writes as though they have actually done research such as this, and all of that persons sources are websites, it is very insulting to actual researchers.

    ReplyDelete
  4. You know what Kelly looks like. that's clearly not her in the pic. what is wrong with you?

    ReplyDelete